Perspective
[b]Lens[/b]One of the most challenging features of wide-angle lens is the ability to stretch perspective. What do I mean by that? I mean that when you look through a wide-angle lens, it seems that the distance between objects has extended. The objects that were not so distant could appear too far away. And the proportion of objects dramatically increases, so the one that close to the camera look enormous, but those, which are father away roughly disappear in the distance.
The wider the angle the shorter and stronger the inequity in the sizes of the elements in the photograph. If we think of two parallel lines that stretch out away from the camera, these two lines will visibly merge at some point. This is a point, which I would call perceptive vanish point for wide angle lens. What do I mean by that? Well, theoretically at this point and beyond (at this distance from the focal plane) all elements would be represented as a dot or not visible at all. For general lens (of in reality) this vanishing point is somewhat farther from the focal plane then for wide angle lens.
What do those two vanishing points mean (for general and wide angle lens)? They mean that the wide angle lens cut the actual (visible) distance to the vanishing point. Which results that our brain, when judging the distance and sizes of the objects in the photograph, assumes that the distance to the vanishing point is the same as with general lens (i.e. Reality). But this assumption makes it to stretch the perspective recorded in the image to the general one.
Making it big
Let's take for example a simple situation, where we have two kids, which should be of similar size. The girl is playing closer to the camera while the boy is watching several feet farther. We make a shot with a wide angle lens. What succeed the lens would bring here? First of all compare the size of the girl and the boy. The boy probably would be two-three times smaller than the girl, while in reality their somewhat of the same height. Ok, the perspective added its succeed and make the boy seem smaller. But in the reality the boy is not that far away. On the picture I it could seem as 15-20 feet (5-7 meters) between the boy and the girl, admittedly only a few feet separated them at that moment. So here you see the first succeed of the wide angle lens - stretching perspective.
And I should say that there is supplementary benefit for a photographer in this. Because the girl appear to be bigger than the boy she becomes the main field without any doubts or supplementary thinking, we just assume it by judging the relative sizes of subjects/objects in the frame. It means that with wide angle lens its much easier to focus viewer's attentiveness on the primary field - the size matters. If we reconsider the relative sizes and how it reduces the significance of the objects/subjects that farther away from the camera, we can say that the other elements of the picture (not the primary one) admittedly become the background for our primary subject. And this trail of plan leads me to a closing that by using wide angle lens we can cut off the field from the rest of stuff in the image by manufacture all other elements to become the background. It looks like we push all other elements farther away from the camera and pull the field much closer to the camera.
Though there is one side thought, it may not all the time be potential to get close to the field and levy that distance between elements in the photograph. It only works when you are very close to the subject, otherwise the use of wide angle lens will have the opposite succeed - it will blend your field in with the rest of the elements of the photograph. And sometimes it may even worsen things, such that some insignificant object on front plane becomes roughly huge and draws a lot of unwanted attention. That's why there are limits to this techniqe, as always.
Seeing a lot
So, by pushing the field farther from the camera we blend it with background. But what if we need to consist of a lot of the scene? What if there is no single subject? Let's say there is a vista or a big room full of people (some kind of event) and we want to get all into the frame. Well, again the wide angle lens could be your choice, because the name of that range says it all. Wide angle means that you can fit a lot of stuff into the image.
Though when you put a lot of stuff into the image all becomes small and less significant. And then the emphasis shifts to the comprehensive "wow effect". When the quantity of elements and their relation to each other play more importance, than qualities of a single element, this mix of many elements becomes the primary subject.
Wide angle lens help when there is a itsybitsy space and you need to jam a big field into the picture. One of the examples is the interior manufacture photography. Let's say we have an assignment to take photographs of a kitchen, which I had some time ago. In my case I had abundance of room to move around, the kitchen was for a show, not for real purposes. But there are times when the space is a great issue, then the only selection is to use a wide angle lens, if you are not focusing on the details and need the comprehensive view of the room.
Dynamics and distortion
Sometime ago I've taken a shot of a man sitting on a car. It was taken with "a hidden camera", I just pointed the camera at the man from the waist level at pressed the shutter. The lens, of course, was the wide angle one - at its widest angle. The legs of the man were closest to the camera, and the head is most distant. How was it represented in the photographs? My first retort would be the disproportion of the man, his legs seem much bigger in relation to his whole body than a someone ordinarily would have. That is one of the the distortion effects which I wanted to point out. It relates to the "Making it big" issue covered earlier in this article. The body parts of the man, which are closer to the camera (in our case those are the legs) appear to be bigger than his other limbs, which are farther away. Such a distortion sometime may add a funny look to a portrait or feature exact features of the subject. You probably have seen many images taken with a fish eye lens - the lens that cover 180 degrees and with most distortions. The first example that comes to my mind is a picture of a dog, which is sniffing the camera. The nose of the dog has the size of the dog's head, which makes it so funny.
The other succeed of distortion is that right lines that cross the frame may appear not that straight. The farther from the image town the line crosses the frame the more it will be bent by the optics. Sometimes with fish eye lens it seems like a merge of lines generate a circle colse to the lens. That's how strongly a distortion can affect the scene in the photograph.
But we have not talked about the dynamics. Where are the dynamics in the picture created with a wide angle lens? In my mind the dynamics in all aspects described above: the stretch of perspective, the differences of the subjects, which are on distinct distances from the camera, the unreal proportions of known shapes and forms and the distortion of the right lines (or any other usual and known visible elements).
Getting personal
Among those technical aspects of the wide angle lens, there is one, which adds its own request for retrial to me. Considering that you are using the lens to take photographs of a person, you are bound to come closer to the subject. Advent closer, huh? It means that most probably the someone would notice you and your camera, which will roughly touch him or her. And if your are noticed by the subject, then the attentiveness will be turned at you and all the activities or interests that kept that someone busy and made him/her challenging for you will be forgotten for a itsybitsy while. And the scene, which you were hunting for, is gone. It seems like you are loosing the benefit of a candid shot and are left with a posed one.
Not at all, if you stick just for a few more minutes and spend some time colse to the subject, the someone would be bored with you and shift his attentiveness to some other, more challenging activities or objects. That's the occasion we have been waiting for - we are close and unnoticed. And the time which we spent waiting for that we made an imperceptible connection with the subject. We learned about some personal side and probably made some impressions and conclusions. All those small things count, they will appear in the photograph, it will generate that personal touch and add the mood to the photograph, which is based on the photographer's comprehension and impression of the subject. I reconsider this side-effect of the wide angle lens one of the prominent aspects. And even if the field is a simple rock laying in the grass, we will have to pay more attentiveness to the rock and by doing so we cannot flee a deeper impression. This personal connection makes as think more about what field we go for to consist of into the frame and what we know about it, what we want to express, which is the core of photography.
Technical stuff
There are a few technical things that you may need to know when using the wide-angle lens. Here is the short record of those (I am not that much into technicalities):
- Lens Hood and Flare - because the lens covers a very wide area there is a great occasion that the sun could mess with your image. To overcome this small question most of the lens are supplied with a lens hood. The hood creates a protection from the sun, but there are two things that collide: the lens is created to allow view as much as potential and the hood tries to provide a protection from the sun. These two plan are somewhat contradictory, so one of them should give in, and that's why the hood for wide angle lens is not such a good protection after all. So, it's your job to watch for the flare and it may be beneficial to use some other objects (such as a sheet of black card) to protect the lens from the sun rays.
- Polarizer - with polarizer you have two concerns. One of them is that the simple thickness of the metallic rim colse to the glass may cause vignetting. The other one is the unevenness of the effect, which is partially depends on the all those various reflection angles that these lens will let through. If we take for example the sky, the best succeed will be when the sun and the camera are at 90 degrees to each other. Though the lens cover a lot more of other angles, where the angles will vary from 45 to 135 degrees. As well I noticed that even without the polarizer the lens saturates the sky more than any other type of lens.
- Depth of Field - the manufacture of the wide angle lens and its optical constraints make the Dof wider than with any other lens. It's very hard (almost impossible) to have a shallow Dof with such lens, so look for other ways to simplify background (such as framing).
- Sharpness - if you have a wide angle zoom lens than you may notice slighter less sharpness at the very wide angle, especially with the widest aperture. That's someone else manufacture constraint, which very hard to avoid as I understand (almost any wide angle zoom lens has this drawback, even the best lens).
- Vignetting - some lens (especially of economy price range) may have dimness in corners at the widest angles and apertures. You may want to check this issue before buying the lens.
0 comments:
Post a Comment